Your monument shall be my gentle verse
That eyes not yet created shall o'er read
And tongues to be, your being, shall rehearse
When all the breathers of your world are dead
You still shall live, such virtue hath my pen
Where breath most breathes - in mouths of men

William Shakespeare (1564-1616)

Tuesday 20 January 2015

John Ginn or Ginns of Wapping, London d. 1778

John's existence was unknown until late 2014, so research on him is very much a work in progress at the moment and it is perfectly possible that more information will become available as time passes.  He has my undying thanks as the provider of the confirmation that proved my theory linking the Ginn family of Melbourn in Cambridgeshire with the Ginns family of Little Easton in Essex.

John was born in around 1708, son of Robert in my last post.  He started life as a Ginn and ended it as a Ginns. It is entirely possible that when his parents moved to Fen Ditton he did not move with them.  What is certain, is that after his widowed mother remarried (1728) and subsequently died (1730) he took himself off to London.  He was there by early 1732.




The name Ginns (see later) is so rare and the coincidence of there being another of that name in Wapping so small, that he has to be the John (of St George's in the East - effectively Wapping) who turns up at the Fleet in early 1732 and marries a Martha Simpson (RG 7. 84)  John was described as a Mariner, ie a seaman.  St George's (above) was carved out of St Dunstans Stepney in 1729 because the area was booming and, following the rebuilding after the Great Fire of 1666, there was huge development in areas not previously built on.  The area was adjacent to the Docks of course and it is likely that John (who was clearly never formally apprenticed as a Peruke Maker) first arrived there and obtained the only work he could - on one of the ships in the docks which were crowded with the masts of both the navy proper and the East India Company, the latter being his most likely source of work.




We have no idea of what happened to Martha, there is no burial entry I can trace.  There were no children either and it is of course possible that John actually undertook a voyage and she was gone when he returned.  There is at least a chance that she was alive when John remarried and that he lied when describing himself as a Bachelor.

For by 1735, John was a Peruke Maker, an occupation he followed for the rest of his life, and was back at the Fleet again where (RG 7. 127) he married Rose Foreman, described as of St Dunstan's in Stepney, the parish out of which St George's had been formed as I say.

A Peruke Maker  was essentially a Barber with additional skills. He cut hair, made and repaired the wigs for men that were the fashion of the day and on display in the shop and also undertook minor surgical duties as a tooth-drawer and, bizarrely to us, a bleeder, as people were routinely bled to improve their health by removing the evil humours in the body.  Men wore their hair short and covered it with their powdered wig, which by this time was getting a lot simpler than formerly.  The explorer James Cook with peruke is shown below, he marrying Elizabeth Batts from the Bell Inn at Execution Dock in Wapping (the inn obviously known to John here) in 1762.



John called himself Ginns from the time of his first marriage - I have no idea why - all of his siblings retained the name Ginn (save Benjamin who became Ginns from 1760 or so).  It may be (he was the eldest son) that his father Robert died in debt which would have been passed on to the eldest son as we have seen with the Fyfield Ginn family.  He may have moved and changed his name for that reason.  Bizarrely, he may have changed his name because the name  (as with so many Hertfordshire Ginns) was pronounced like the drink, and at this time in London there was an anti-Gin craze as it was the drink of the poor and the cause of major social unrest.  Certainly other Ginn men changed their names for curious reasons, as correspondents have told me.  Likely only John knew.

I am sure that John was employed and did not work on his own account.  We have him in the Land Tax from 1746 and he was in Well Close Ward, in St George's and one of the Tower Liberties, ie under the administration of the Tower of London which was close by.   Well Close Ward was effectively Wellclose Square and John is known to have lived in Ship Alley, which was part of an area built in the 1680s and ran off Wellclose Square to the south, on the way down to the Ratcliffe Highway and on to the docks as its name suggests.  The area was respectable in John's time, but became very popular with immigrants in the late Victorian period and became something of a slum, but I upload photos below which show Ship Alley from Wellclose Square on the left side as you look in about 1900 and the same view today.  Ship Alley has now gone and is a park,  but the tree on the right may well be the same as in 1900.





John and Rose also had no issue and, oddly, she also disappears from the records.  There were no apparent cemeteries yet built in London and therefore I fail to see why she would not be recorded as a parish burial, unless John were following the example of the contemporary fictional barber, Sweeney Todd !


By the 1750s John had yet another wife, Elizabeth.  I cannot find any marriage entry.  She seems to be the mother of John's only ever child, as Elizabeth Ginns died at Ship Alley in 1758 and their obvious child Margaret in 1759.

John soldiered on, and in 1762 married his fourth wife, the widow Elizabeth Forbes, by licence at St George's.  She was to be his last.

John Ginns "Barber" died at St George's in 1778 - he was about 70.  He left mourning rings to many family members in Melbourn, Little Easton and elsewhere and everything else to Elizabeth who died at St George's in 1786 with a quoted age of 72.  The second page of John's original will with his signature is below.  He was obviously in a bad way and the will was written 13th June and he was buried 15th July - the signature on his marriage of 1762 is much stronger.




Robert Ginn of Melbourn & Fen Ditton d. 1728

Robert Ginn here, son of Thomas in my last post has been, and continues to be, a difficult man to research.

Years ago, in 1998, I discovered the reference to this guy in the will of his great aunt as "one of cozen Thomas Ginns two boyes".  Years later, I had done enough research at the Cambridge Record Office to establish that it was this guy who married in 1705.  By 2008 or so I had discovered his will, subsequently traced his widow to Elsworth and evolved a theory that linked the family to one in Essex.  But while I had a theory, while I had strong circumstantial evidence, there was no proof - then in very late 2014 a will turned up - the theory was proved and I was dragged from my comfortable winter home on a three hour journey to the Cambridge Record Office and yet more research.




In the circumstances, I cannot be entirely certain when Robert was born.  It seems to be the 1660s or later, at least one and likely two Roberts died before him for sure.  His wife was probably born in around 1675 given the date of the last child.

He married Jane Burton at Cambridge in 1705.  It is noted in the Melbourn register but he did not marry there and I suspect that the marriage was a non-conformist one, as a few of the non conformist marriages, births and burials in Melbourn were  recorded in Anglican registers.

I know nothing as yet of Jane Burton, and it would be interesting to know more, particularly given that the couple eventually moved to Fen Ditton near Cambridge.  Perhaps more will emerge in due course.


There were a number of manors in Melbourn, but the main manorial records survive for this period and no Ginn is mentioned in them (CRO) so I can only speculate as to Robert's occupation whilst in Melbourn as we have nothing to go on.

As we have seen, most of the Melbourn population were non-conformists, mainly Congregationalists.  Robert and Jane were clearly no exceptions.  The Pastor John Nicholls, mentioned in my last post appears to have begun to preach in the open air at Melbourn in 1694.  By the early 1700s the congregation was so large that they were able to finance a meeting house, now the United Reformed Church which was built in Orchard Road, Melbourn in 1717 and is shown above.  Robert and Jane must have known this well, as did their children and one adult daughter and some grandchildren.

The couple seem to have lived in Melbourn proper from 1705 to 1720 or so, but by the early 1720s they were clearly in the hamlet (albeit a seperate parish)  of Abington Pigotts, clearly living on the borders of this and Melbourn and Bassingbourn, as there are anglican records in both of those parishes describing them "of Abington" and the way Robert was described perhaps suggesting that the guy was of some note.  It is just possible (see further below) that he went to Abington to become the landlord of  Abington's only ever inn, built in the reign of Queen Ann (1702-1714) and now known as the "Pig & Abbot"  (but formerly for a very long time the "Darby & Joan") which is still going and is shown below.  But this is speculation.




What I know for sure is that Robert and Jane were in Abington Pigotts until at least 1723, but between 1724 and 1727 there was a major shift, because the couple moved to "Papermills".  At least the younger children went with them.  I found Robert's will in about 2008, and there he was describing himself as a "Yeoman of Papermills".  So where was Papermills ?  Online research, and a phone call to the Cambridge Record Office suggested that this was Fen Ditton, but there were several papermills in Cambridgeshire, Fen Ditton burials were not indexed online or in the NBI and this was an educated assumption until I went to the Cambridge Record Office before Christmas 2014.  The couple indeed moved to Fen Ditton.

They moved to take over an Inn, possibly as I say their second.  Because Robert is described as an Innkeeper in Fen Ditton records, which for some reason astonished me.

There was a papermill at Fen Ditton from the 1500s, the second in the country.  The River Cam was essential for the job.  Robert helpfully tells us that he lived in Papermills, which was  mile long area to the east of the Leper Chapel in Cambridge but west of the village of Fen Ditton itself.  At this time it was very undeveloped and consisted mostly of damp meadows and there was little more than a track leading in to it, indeed Fen Ditton's main communications with the outside world until sometime later were via the River Cam.

Now Fen Ditton is about 15 miles from Melbourn and, unless the Burton family had some connection with the pub ( I can find nothing), it seems a strange move.  My best guess is that Robert moved to take over an Inn that had become available having been an innkeeper and looking for a better one.  My research suggests that we have a choice of two, because the Papermills area restricts the choice.  He either took over "The Globe" (once in the 1700s called "The Papermills Inn") now a restaurant, or he took "The Plough", Fen Ditton's oldest Inn and a former papermill.  Both are shown below.  The first surviving record of the "Globe" however dates to 1760.  The Plough has existed from the 1600s and though much altered, sits on its former site at Green End.  This Inn was a significant coaching inn in the 1700s and was the place where local worthies and magistrates held their meetings.  My suspicion therefore is that for at least a few years, Robert was the landlord of the "Plough".


          Above "The Globe" below "The Plough" from the River Cam

Robert Ginn died in February 1728.  He left everything (without telling us what it was) to Jane.  His original will, signature above, is at the CRO.


Years ago, whilst digging for something else, I found a book at the Society of Genealogists with an indexed marriage licence for Jane.  In 1728 "Jane Ginn of Fen Ditton" married John Robins of Elsworth, they married at Cambridge, St Michael.

So Jane and what remained of the younger children moved to Elsworth, another 15 mile hike from Fen Ditton, over towards Huntingdon.  Robins seems to have been a Yeoman.

                                                 Elsworth

Unfortunately Jane, past childbearing, did not herself live long - "the wife of John Robins"  died at Elsworth in 1730, she was about 55.

Robert and Jane had a number of children.  With only two baptisms recorded it is virtually impossible to have a complete list but this is what we know

Robert - I have assumed that he was the eldest son, born in about 1706.  He died in 1723, recorded in the Bassingbourn register, "Robert Ginn of Abington unbaptized", the parish clerk noting his non conformity.

John - see next post

Mary - one of only two baptisms - born in 1710.  She was of working age when her parents moved and I suspect stayed in Melbourn.  She married Robert Adams (a Butcher) at Melbourn in 1735 and they had two children, Sarah 1736 and Ann 1741 before Adams died the same year.  In 1755 Mary Adams, widow, married Samuel Jarman widower, by licence at Melbourn.  Jarman came from a major Yeoman family of non conformists in Melbourn and it is likely that Samuel Jarman jnr born in circa 1755 (there is of course no baptism) was this couple's.  Both she and Samuel are mentioned in her brother John's will of 1778 - they are left mourning rings .  Mary Jarman wife of Samuel died in 1782 aged 71. There are known descendants of Ann Adams who married a Melbourn "dealer" from a family of the same, Thomas Worland, and also Samuel Jarman jnr.  Many are in Australia and I have been in touch.

Elizabeth - she was alive in 1778, a spinster.  A mourning ring was left in bro. John's will.  No idea where she was.

Benjamin - see post of 4th March 2013

James - likely born in about 1712 - he died at Elsworth in 1731.

Sarah - born and baptized at Bassingbourn in 1722. Bro John in 1778 mentions a niece, Sarah King  ,who was likely her daughter and I am searching for connections


Thomas Ginn of Reed & Melbourn d. 1718

Thomas Ginn here, son of Thomas in my post of 4th March 2013, has long been a mystery, and mostly a mystery because he was a non-conformist.

When I first started this research in 1989 there was no IGI online, hardly any "online" at all in fact, and I worked with a word processor and did my research in dusty record offices and archives, looking at original documents or, if I was really lucky, a microfiche or microfilm with the potential of an index.

It was in this context that I first came across Thomas.  There were mere snippets of information - a baptism and a burial or two, a mention in  a Hearth Tax return, but no manorial records or wills, and only a hint in fact that the guy lived at all.

Thomas married just after the English Civil War, in the Commonwealth period, when few if any marriage records survive.

His wife's name would appear to have been Ann, although I cannot be certain that he married only once but I know he and Ann had a number of children in Reed near Therfield.


                             The ancient Saxon church at Reed

To explain to the reader who does not know Hertfordshire, I should explain that as you go north of Buntingford on the road to Royston and beyond to Cambridge you will encounter several rural villages and see enticing signposts to several more, "Ginn country" as my wife jokingly refers to them.  Reed is directly on this road, with Barkway to the right and Reed End (which effectively formed part of Therfield in older times) to the left. Therfield and the ridge which forms the boundary between Hertfordshire and Cambridgeshire can be seen on the left as you drive up to Royston.  The best way to illustrate this is a snippet I have taken from a 1766 map I have of Hertfordshire which is uploaded below.




Thomas was clearly not that prosperous, and was likely a labourer or Husbandman, but he came from the Yeoman class and I think it certain that he referred to himself as such.

It is equally certain to me that Thomas was a non-conformist, at least after he moved beyond Royston and just across the border into Melbourn in Cambridgeshire in the 1660s as he clearly did. This move likely being the result of the influence of his Aunt Elizabeth Munsey (nee Ginn) who lived in Melbourn and in her will mentions "cozen Thomas Ginns two boyes"



Thomas and wife moved between 1656 and 1662,  the Hearth Tax indeed having him gone from Hertfordshire but in Melbourn with a home with two hearths in 1674.

Thomas and family clearly took to non conformity in its early days.  The area around Royston was a centre of non-conformity, for independents, baptists and congregationalists alike.  The great John Bunyan (1628-1688 - shown)  preached at Melbourn.    The "apostle of Cambridgeshire", Francis Holcroft (1633-1692) was the vicar of neighbouring Bassingbourne (1655-1660) and campaigned and preached in these villages for the rest of his life (being jailed in Cambridge Castle at one point) converting huge numbers in the area to the congregational way of thinking.  In 1676 Melbourn had dozens of non-conformists, in 1679 twelve families of which were followers of Francis Holcroft alone (British-history.ac.uk).  By 1700 the Bassingbourn/Meldreth Congregational Church met in Melbourn (originally in the open air) and after 1707 the Pastor of both meeting houses at Chishill and Melbourn John Nicholls, who preached at each on alternate Sundays, is known to have had a congregation in excess of 400.  By this time it will be no surprise to readers that the greater part of the Melbourn population were non conformists.  More of this, as it is essential to the narrative, will be detailed in the next post.

Ann Ginn "wife of Thomas" died in  1705.  Thomas Ginn "father of Robert" followed her in 1718, he was 92 - they certainly lived long lives in this branch of the family.

There are four children known

Thomas - is untraced

Robert - there were two - for the second see next post

Sarah - married Thomas Butler, a Congregationalist, at the Old Meeting House in Royston in 1701.  He was some sort of tradesman in Royston and  a study of Butler wills has revealed that there were issue, though the whole Butler clan being non-conformists means that none of these have any anglican baptism record.


William Ginn of Chrishall d. 1703

William Ginn here was the youngest son of Thomas and Katherine in my post of 4th March 2013.

I know next to nothing about him.  He was likely a labourer and married Elizabeth Rickett at Chrishall in 1675.  Chrishall is a parish that whilst in Essex, lies adjacent to Hertfordshire and Cambridgeshire also.  The parish registers for Chrishall do not survive for before 1661, but no Ginn was shown there in any of the Hearth Tax returns and William's mother's family had connections with Chrishall, so I am sure of the connection.  My suspicion is that Elizabeth was a widow as neither she nor William were that young, both in their mid thirties.



There are four children recorded to them, and although it is tempting to think that others not noted filled the gap in the baptisms, the fact is that each of the known four are accounted for and no others are shown, so the record may well be complete.

William Ginn (given as "old William Ginn") died in 1703, he was 65.  Elizabeth "widow" Ginn died in 1727, likely about 85 on my calculation.

The children were as follows


Mary - married John Farris at Chrishall in 1698

Ann - died "daughter of William" in 1694, she was 15

William - died "William jnr" in 1702 aged 18

David - fascinates me.  The guy is given as "Parie" in the IGI, but the original entry gives the baptism as Davie.  He survived and my strong suspicion is that David Ginn here married Mary Marshall at Cherry Hinton in Cambridgeshire in 1708 when he was 21, and had a substantial family.  Research awaits